Wednesday, March 18, 2009

April Fools' Day Origin

There are several explanations for the origin of April Fools' Day, but here is the most plausible one. April 1st was once New Year's Day in France. In 1582, Pope Gregory declared the adoption of his Gregorian calendar to replace the Julian calendar and New Year's Day was officially changed to January 1st. It took awhile for everyone in France to hear the news of this major change and others obstinately refused to accept the new calendar, so a lot of people continued to celebrate New Year's Day on the first of April � earning them the name April fools. The April fools were subjected to ridicule and practical jokes and the tradition was born. The butts of these pranks were first called poisson d'avril or April fish because a young naive fish is easily caught. A common practice was to hook a paper fish on the back of someone as a joke. This evolved over time and a custom of prank-playing continues on the first day of April.

Mauryan And Sunga Periods [321-72 B.C.] - Ancient Indian Costume

History and Social Life Mauryan & Sunga Empires

This age witnessed the emergence of India�s first great empire. When Alexander entered the Punjab just before the establishment of the Mauryan Empire, it was with the view to develop its immense commercial resources. Trade with Babylon had long been established. As such, there were many cultural cross currents between China, Persia, and India. Alexander founded trading posts all along his course, and left behind Greek colonists who finally intermarried with the Indians. Chandragupta Maurya himself married a princess from the Greek Seleucid Court.

Chandragupta Maurya lived in considerable state. In the processions held on festive occasions, elephants decked in gold and silver, four horsed chariots and yokes of oxen took part. In the towns people dressed in flowered muslin embroidered with jewels. The palaces are said to have been truly luxurious, with great pillared rooms of state, like those in Iran, the golden pillars decorated with embossed vine leaves and silver birds. These palaces were set in lovely parks full of shady trees, many of which had been imported to give variety, and boating as a sport was popular on artificial lakes full of fish.

This was an age of plenty, even for the poor, as the fields were fertile, the basic crops being rice, barley, wheat, millet, and sugarcane. Metals including gold and silver were mined. The state gave the people security and protection, maintained roads, and provided reservoirs and wells. All this helped to create a sense of well-being in the populace. Cattle breeding was as important during the Vedic Age as it is now, and in addition to milk products provided skin, leather, horn, hair and wool which were used in various crafts.

Trade was carried on by ships through the ports along the coastline of Maharashtra, the Malabar Coast, the Tamil country, and Bengal. Land routes were expanded to join the Ancient Silk route through Central Asia to China, and large caravans undertook hazardous journeys for the sake of the profits that were to be made by the adventurous.

Costume
Men and women continued to wear three unstitched garments, as in Vedic times. The main garment was the antariya of white cotton, linen or flowered muslin, sometimes embroidered in gold and precious stones. For men, it was an unstitched length of cloth draped around the hips and between the legs in the kachcha style, extending from the waist to the calf or ankles or worn even shorter by peasants and commoners. The antariya was secured at the waist by a sash or kayabandh, often tied in a looped knot at the center front of the waist. The kayabandh could be simple sash, vethaka; one with drum-headed knot at the ends, muraja; a very elaborate band of embroidery, flat and ribbon-shaped, pattika; or a many-stringed one, kalabuka. The third item of clothing called uttariya was another length of material, usually fine cotton, very rarely silk, which was utilized as a long scarf to drape the top half of the body.

The uttariya was worn in several ways to suit the comforts of the wearer: very elegantly by those at court, who drape it on both shoulders or one shoulder, or diagonally across the chest and casually knotted at the waist, or it could even be worn loosely across the back and supported by the elbows or wrist, and in many other ways according to the whims of the weather. But for the labourer and the craftsman, it was more a practical garment to be tied around the head as protection from sun, or tightly around the waist leaving the hands free for work, or again as a towel to mop the face when sweating. Its uses were endless for the poor sections of the society and for them it would be made of coarse cotton.

Women tied their antariya in different ways. Originally opaque, it later became more and more transparent. A simple small antariya or strip of cloth, langoti was attached to the kayabandh at the center front, and then passed between the legs and tucked in at the back. A longer version of the antariya was the knee-length one, being first wrapped around and secured at the waist, the longer end then pleated and tucked in at the front, and the shorter end finally drawn between the legs, Kachcha style, and tucked in at the waist at the back. Another version, the lehnga style, was a length of cloth wrapped around the hips tightly to form a tabular type of skirt. This was not drawn between the legs in the kachcha style.

The uttariyas of upper-class women were generally of thin material decorated with elaborated borders and quite often worn as a head covering. Their kayabandhs were very similar to those of the men. In addition, they sometimes wore a patka, a decorative piece of cloth attached to the kayabandh in front by tucking in one end at the waist. The patka was made from plaited wool or cotton, twisted yarn or leather, and at times it was also woven.

Although, footwear is often mentioned in Vedic literature there is no sculptural evidence for this period, except in the case of soldiers who wear the Persian boot. It may be because shoes could not be taken inside a stupa or Buddhist temple, that they were not depicted on the sculptures on stupas.

In the more remote villages and jungles, shepherds, hunters and people of similar occupations were mostly aboriginal or belonged to the lowest caste. They generally wore simple unbleached coarse varieties of the cotton antariya and turbans, much the same as we find today, and the practice of tattooing was fairly common. The more primitive tribes who lived in the forest wore garments made from grass (Kusa), skin, and fur.

Headgear and Hairstyles
Women generally covered their heads with the uttariya, worn straight or crosswise, often resplendent with beautiful borders. The hair, centrally parted, was made into one or two plaits or in a large knot at the back. The uttariya could be worn simply hanging down at the back or secured to the head with a headband, or with one end arranged in a fan at the top of the head. Skullcaps were sometimes worn under or over the uttariya to keep it in place, or at times it could be decorated with a fringe or pendants. Helmets too are seen as headgear for phrygian women who probably wore long-sleeved tunic with tight fitting trousers and a phrygian cap which was conical and had ear flaps. In India, the Amazons wore in addition, the crossed-at-chest belt vaikaksha, with metal buckles, shield, and sword. Women sometimes used turbans of decorated cloth.

As regards male headgear, in the early Maureen period there is no trace of the turban mauli, but in the Sunga period we find great emphasis on this form of male head dress. These were remarkable headdresses in which the hair itself was often twisted into a braid along with the turban cloth. This twisted braid was then arranged to form a protuberance at the front or the side of the head but never at the center top, as only priests could use this style. Over the turban a band was sometimes used to hold it in place. In addition, decorative elements like a jewelled brooch or a jhalar (fringe) could be attached to the turban, or one end folded in pleats and tucked in like a fan.

Jewellery
From the sculptures we find there was a richness and profusion in the jewellery worn by both men and women. Earlier, it had a massive quality to it and the workmanship was coarse. A little later, with the Sungas, the jewellery became somewhat refined. In the Arthashastra attributed to Kautilya, and in the sculptures of the period we find references which show us that the material used most frequently were gold and precious stones like corals, rubies, sapphires, agates, and crystals. Pearls too were used and beads of all kinds were plentiful including those made of glass. Certain ornaments were common to both sexes, like earrings, necklaces, armlets, bracelets and embroidered belts. Earring or karnika were of three types-a simple ring or circle called Kundala, a circular disc earring known as dehri and earrings with a flower-like shape known as Karnaphul.

Necklaces of two kinds were worn. A short one called Kantha which was broad and flat, usually gold, inlaid with precious stones, and a long one, the lambanam. These chain or bead necklaces were sometimes three-to-seven stringed and were named after the number of strings of which they were composed. At the centre of each string of beads was an amulet for warding off evil forces. Baju band or armlets of gold and silver beads were worn on the upper arm, and were occasionally studded with precious stones. Bracelets called Kangan, very often made of square or round beads of gold, and richly embroidered cloth belts completed the male ensemble. Women, in addition, wore girdle called mekhala, a hip belt of multi-stringed beads, originally made from the red seed kaksha but now made of gold and silver beads, with shapes ranging from round to square and oval. Dancing girls added on to these, chains of gold and silver to which bells were attached. All women wore anklets and thumb and finger rings. The rings were plain and crowded together on the middle joints of the fingers. Anklets were often of gold in this period, though silver was more common. They could be in the form of a simple ring, Kara, a thick chain, sankla, oran ornamental circle with small bells called ghungru.

There is no evidence of nose-rings in the period. Forehead ornaments for women were quite common and worn below the parting of the hair and at the center of the fore-head. These consisted of thin plate of gold or silver stamped in various patterns, as well as a star-shaped sitara and bina. And a tiny ornament called bindi.

The only material evidence we have of a piece of Mauryan jewellery is a single earring found at Taxila dated second century BC which similar to Graeco-Roman and Etruscan Jewellery.

Military Costume
Sewn garments which had been used by the Persian soldiers were sometimes utilized for military dress by the Mauryans. This consisted of a sleeved tunic with cross straps across the chest to carry the quiver, and a leather belt with sword. The lower garment was more often the Indian antariya rather than the Persian trousers. The headgear was usually the turban or headband, whereas the Persians had worn the pointed cap. The mixture of foreign and indigenous garments is interesting as it shows one of the early phases of evolution in the costumes of Indians. This came about in the colder north, where the Persian garments were more suitable, climatically and functionally, in case of soldiers. Although, coats of mail are mentioned in the Arthshastra there is no visual evidence of it in this period.

Religious Persons
of the three religions- Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism, it was Hinduism which evolved from early Vedic sources with sacrifice as its main ritual and had as its keepers of religion the Brahmin priests, who belonged to what later came to be the highest category in the caste system as practiced in India. Later in life, a Brahmin man or woman became a sadhu or sanyasin, seeking detachment.

The Brahmanical Sadhu (Sanyasin) was an ascetic who lived either in a hermitage or visited holy places. He wore a shaped kilt-like garment made of strips sewn together, which was tied at the waist with a cord. A short rectangular cloak covered the left shoulder and breast, leaving the right side exposed. The hair and beard were allowed to grow, the former being plaited and arranged in a spiral at the top of the head. He sometimes wore a head dress in the shape of a cap. Women ascetics too wore this cloak and what appeared to be a cap. These garments, often made from leaves or the complete bark of tree, were tied with a cord. Such a bark garment is still worn by the Kumbipatta sect in Orissa. Skins of antelope and goat called ajina were used by anchorites and wild ascetics, muni, as a covering for the chest. Men ascetics did not cut their nails, hair and beard and carried there few possessions on a yoke balanced on the shoulders.

Buddhism, founded by Gautam Buddha, fifth century BC, had no caste division. It had a religious order of monks, bhikshu, and nuns, bhikshuni, who set up monasteries where they studied their religion, later leaving to preach and collect alms.

Buddhist monks normally shaved their heads and beards but kept the head covered with a headdress. If unshaven, the hair was worn in a knot on top of the head. Lay brothers wore theirs on the right side of the head. Their dress was the common antariya with an uttariya and a larger chadder, all dyed saffron. Buddhist monks, bhikshu, had few possessions and their clothes were made of rags patched together and dyed red or yellow. These consisted of a lower garment antaravasaka, an upper garment uttarasanga, a cloak samghati, a waist clothe kushalaka, and buckled belt samakaksika. Worn-out leather soles strapped to their feet completed their attire. Their possessions consisted of a patra or begging bowl, a razor, tweezers for removing hair, clippers for cutting toe and finger nails, an ear pick, a tooth pick, gauze for filtering drinking water, a needle, a walking stick, an umbrella, a fan and a bag of medicines.

The third religion Jainsim, was propagated by Mahavira, b. fifth century BC and its main doctrine was ahinsa, non-violence. Later two sects developed-the sky clad (naked) Digamber sect and the white clad Svetamber sect. Both had nuns and monks who functioned as missionaries.

In the Jain monastic order, monks and nuns wore a white costume consisting of a robe and cloak. They covered their nose and mouth with a piece of gauze to ensure they would not inhale even the smallest living organism and so cause its death. Their hair and beard were shaven and most lived the life of missionaries continuously travelling on foot. The Jain ascetics smeared their bodies with mud, took the vow of silence, clothed themselves in skirts made of bark, and carried a stick made of three rods bound together, and an umbrella. They wore brass ring and brass bangles. Their other possessions included a water jug, clay bowl, and pot with spout, broom, hook, portable stool, rosary, and an alms bowl.

Textiles and Dyes
Weaving of fine and coarse varieties of cloth was well established. Cotton, silk, wool, linen and jute fabrics were readily available. Furs and the better varieties of wool and silk like tussar, called kausheya like Eri or Muga silk of Assam, yellowish in its natural color but when bleached called patrona, were used. Kaseyyaka (High quality cotton or silk) and the bright red woolen blankets of Gandhara were worth a small fortune each. A rain proof woolen cloth was available in Nepal. Resist dyeing and hand printing in a pattern on cloth has been mentioned by Greek visitors to the court of Chandragupta Maurya, as is the Indian glazed cotton cloth which was in common use by 400 BC. Material similar to the khinkhwab (which is the interweaving of silk and gold or silver wires beautiful floral pattern) was in great demand and even exported to Babylon long before the Mauryas.

Cotton, wool and a fabric called karpasa were available in the north in both coarse and fine varieties. There were also fine muslins often embroidered in purple and gold and transparent like later-day material which came to be called shabnam (morning dew). The coarse varieties were used by the populace. Woolen cloth, avika, from the sheep�s wool was either pure white (bleached) or dyed pure red, rose, or black. Blankets or kambala were either made by completing the edges with borders or braids, or woven wool strips were joined together. The process of felting (pressing the fibers together, instead of weaving) was also making known. All varieties of wool were available, coarse for making head-dresses, trappings and blankets for richer class.

Washermen were also dyers, rajaka, and they perfumed garments after washing them. Four primary color were recognized in the dyeing of textiles: red (dyed with safflower and madder), white (through bleaching), yellow (natural color of yarn and saffron), and blue (indigo leaves). Fabrics were also woven in patterns and printed for use as carpets, bedcovers, blankets, and clothes.

Style
Forceful sculptures carved during the Mauryan-Sunga period in the first century BC in the north at Bharut and Sanchi give us a feeling of superhuman power. The drapery hangs heavy folds and the jewellery is massive and somewhat coarse. Turbans coil and twist with the hair to form protuberances, with serpentine armlets and anklets closing in on strong limbs. The head veils of the woven are voluminous; long-beaded aprons and crossed scarves at he chest suggest fruitful abundance, and necklaces and strings with amulet boxes suspended on the breasts indicate a fear of evil and dark forces around. With the coming of the Sunga dynasty there is greater emphasis on detail in the elaborate jewellery of the women, which is more elegant and finer and adorns the figures seen in soft relaxed postures.


Mauryan & Sunga - Donor figure [Bharut]Donor Figure [Bharut]

Antariya : Lower cloth, calf length, of fine cotton with fluted ends in front, worn in kachcha style, that is between the legs.

Uttariya : Upper cloth of printed cotton worn crosswise on the head.

Kayabandh : Embroidered flat cloth band, pattika style, worn in a looped knot with fringed ends.

Mekhala : Six-stringed hip belt of gold or silver beads.

Lambanam : long necklace made of chains held at intervals by flat bands, phalakahara style.

Kantha : Short necklace of five strings of beads in gold or silver.

Karnika : Trumpet-shaped earrings.

Kangan : Ten bracelets adorning each hand.

Baju Band : Decorative armlets worn on upper arms.

Kara : Anklets of twisted wire worn on both ankles.

Sitara : Star shaped forehead ornament of gold or silver with a stamped pattern.

Mauryan & Sunga - Kuvera Yaksha [Bharut]Kuvera Yaksha [Bharut]

Antariya : Kachcha style, both equal ends being taken between the legs after knotting the front; these ends are then held diagonally, fluted and tucked into the waist at the back to hang between the legs up to the ground

Uttariya : upavita fashion, worn across the chest and over the left shoulder

Kayalbandh : muraja style, drum-headed knobs at the ends, tied in a looped knot

Baju Band : armlets with elaborate incised pattern

Kangan : several bracelets on each wrist

Karnika : trumpet-shaped earring or karnaphul

Mauli : turban of printed cloth held by decorative bands wound over the top knot of hair and at the side of the head

Mauryan & sunga - Warrior [Bharut]Warrior [Bharut]

Antariya : knee-length, worn in kachcha style with fluted end tucked in at centre front

Tunic : one of the earliest depictions of the cut and sewn garment; it has short sleeves and a round neck, full front opening with ties at the neck and waist, and is hip length

Boots : fitting to the knees

Head band : tied at the back over short hair

A broad flat sword with cross straps on the sheath is suspended from the left shoulder.

Mauryan & Sunga - Courtier [Bharut]COURTIER [Bharut]

turban is wound around the long hair tied in a top knot; to fix the turban in place a decorative band has been used; large disc-type earrings and two strings of beads adorn the neck

Mauryan & Sunga - Necklace [Bharut]Necklace [Bharut]

Kantha : short neckalce called tilari (three-stringed); each string consists of graduated peaarls and a central gem

four-stringed : chaulari

five-stringed : paklari

seven-stringed : satlari

Mauryan & Sunga - Armlets [Patna]Armlets [Patna]

serpentine armlets are of the Achaemenid type and depict the Iranian influence on Indian jewellery of this period; he wears an antariya in the lehnga style, an uttariya and a thick many-stringed kayabandh with knotted ends-kalabuka


Mauryan and Sunga Yakshi [Baranmara]YAKSHI [Baranmara]

Antariya : langoti style small strips of cloth drawn between the legs and attached to a cord at the waist.

Uttariya : There are two: one has an embroidered border and is worn crosswise over the head with a jhalar (networking fringe) at the forehead; the other is draped across the back and over both arms.

Kayabandh : Flat cloth band, pattika style, worn in a looped knot.

Mekhala : Four stringed beads hip belt.

Patka : A strip of woven beads tucked in at the front of the waist reaching the ankles

Atkan : bead necklace worn aslanr over the left shoulder and under the right arm

Kangan : five bead bracelets on each wrist

Baju Band : three row of beads on the upper arms

Karnika : trumpet shaped earring

Lambanam : long necklace of beads

Kantha : Short necklace of beads

Sankla : anklets made of thick chains

Mauryan & Sunga - Donor Figure [Bharut]Donor Figure [Bharut]

Antariya : worn in same style as in the Kuvera Yaksha except that only one long end is tucked in at the back, the other is a finely pleated apron tucked into the centre front of the antariya.

Uttariya : looped at the chest and thrown back over both shoulders.

Kayabandh : embroidered flat cloth band, Pattika style.

Lambanam : phalakahara style necklace.

Baju Band : simple leaf-patterned armlet.

Kangan : three bracelets of beads on each wrist

Karnika : trumpet-shaped earrings, Karnaphul

Mauli : turban in which the long hair and cloth are twisted together, wound around the head and made into a top knot in front, the cloth then continues to be wound around the head and fixed with a separate band.



Mauryan & Sunga - Donor figure [Bharu]Donor Figure [Bharut]

Uttariya : printed or woven in a lozenge design in stripes, with a border; it is worn crosswise on the head and thrown back hanging to the waist like pouch

Kantha : short necklace with granulated design

lambanam : in phalakahara style

Hair ornament : jewelled and worn below centre parting of the hair

Mauryan & Sunga - Courtier [Bharut]COURTIER [Bharut]

long hair is twisted into a top knot at the left around which the turban is wound so as to completely cover it, an ornament heart shaped brooch is fixed on the right front and a decorative band visible at the forehead is tied under the turban

mauryan_sunga_girdle_bharut.gif (3524 bytes)Girdle [Bharut]

Mekhala : elaborate seven-stringed saptaki, the two outer strands are square, interspersed with rows of beads across and aslant the hips in gold or hard stone, and are early imitations of the strings of red rati seeds that were originally worn; the pattika, a flat ribbon-shaped embroidered gridle of cloth of gold is also worn

Mauryan & Sunga - Eearring [Bharut]Earring [Bharut]

Karnika : this style of earring in the form of a triratna or triple gem of Buddhist triad, was peculiar to the Buddhist; this symbol was used on necklaces and to decorate soldiers, scabbards and the top of standards

Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu is a living museum where cultures and traditions that developed over 2,000 years ago still flourish. Perhaps more than any other Indian state, Tamil Nadu displays not only the great antiquity of its culture, but also the viability - even the necessity - of this culture in today's rapidly changing society.

The Dravidian culture of Tamil Nadu is as ancient and complex as any the world has known. Among the great dynasties of the south that held sway here, the Chola kings are synonymous with power and compassion, magnificent temples and the delicate bronze images of their deities.

Hyderabad

Hyderabad
Charminar, Mecca Masjid, Falaknuma Palace of Hyderabad, Purana Haveli, Hyderabad Zenana Quarters...

Although Hyderabad is now the capital of Andhra Pradesh and one of India's largest cities, its days as the capital of the Qutb Shahi dynasty, as a center of the Mughal empire and as the seat of the wealthy Nizams have left an indelible mark. Regardless of Hyderabad's increasing importance in modern India, the city most people are drawn to is the Hyderabad of history. It is the only large South Indian city whose architecture, history and culture all are predominantly Muslim and it is this image which endures. Although the older generation will tell you that nothing is left of the grace and culture of the past but ruins and memories, it is they who preserve the dying echoes of bygone magnificence.

The first dynasty to make an impact here was that of the Qutb Shahi king who rose to power in the 16th century. Until they moved to Hyderabad in 1590 they ruled from the nearby fortress at Golconda. Upon arrival in Hyderabad they promptly built the city's most famous landmark, the Charminar, commemorating the end of a plague epidemic I 1591. The Charminar, with a mosque on its upper floor, looms over the heart of the city. During the day it wears a tired and weary look as all forms of Indian transport hurtle around it; only at night, when the four delicate minarets are illuminated, does it take on a youthful and more romantic appearance.

The Mecca Masjid, near the Charminar, is one of the world's largest and most impressive mosques, accommodating 10,000 of the faithful at one time. The entrance arches and colonnades were made from huge slabs of granite which required more than 1,400 bullocks to haul from the quarry 11 kilometers (seven miles) away. The Mecca Masjid has been both a witness to and a silent participants In Hyderabad's history. During its construction the Qutb Shahi kingdom was annexed by the Mughals and, although building began under Abdullah Qutb Shahi in 1614, it was not completed until 1687 under the reign of Aurangzeb.

Seven Qutb Shahi kings were followed by seven Mughals and then by seven Nizams, whose personalities and legendary wealth have contributed to the Hyderabad mystique. The last Nizam, Sir Osman Ali Khan, was officially addressed as His Exalted Highness (and was the only Indian prince the British allowed to use such an elevated title) but was universally referred to as 'the richest man in the world'. He was an eccentric miser who dressed shabbily and smoked cigarette ends but kept a diamond the size of an ostrich egg on his desk - wrapped in newspaper. He also founded the local Osmania University which specializes in Persian, Arabic and Urdu studies.

Although a Hyderabadi nobleman built the Falaknuma Palace for himself, he had little choice but to give it to the Nizam after he had admired it, particularly its lavish European-style interior. The Nizam added this beautiful palace to his list of residences but hardly ever visited it. The sumptuousness of the Pura Haveli, another of the Nizam's palaces, can be gauged by a single wardrobe; the silks, brocades, damasks and fine muslins it once bulged with have gone but it still stretches for 800 meters (half a mile). The royal women lived in strict purdah, secluded from prying eyes in the adjoining Zenana quarters.

The 3,500 objects in the Salar Jung Museum were all acquired by one of the Nizam's prime ministers, Mir Yusuf Ali Salar Jung III. Fabulously wealthy in his own right, he was an acquisitive and insatiable collector, whose agents haunted the world's salerooms. Although much of what was brought back to Hyderabad was of inferior quality, recent reorganization of the museum has resulted in the discovery of several outstanding works. Many European artists are represented, but by their better work. Although there is a fine Canaletto, it is the jewels, ornaments, ivories and manuscripts of the North Indian court that are so outstanding. Of particular interest are the jeweled swords and daggers of the Mughal emperors and the thrones and turbans of Tippu Sultan.

Interesting History Lesson

Have a history teacher explain this----- if they can.

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860.
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.
Both Presidents were shot in the head.

Now it gets really weird.

Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's Secretary was named Lincoln.

Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.

Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.

Now hang on to your seat.

Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford.'
Kennedy was shot in a car called ' Lincoln' made by 'Ford.'

Lincoln was shot in a theater and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and his assassin ran and hid in a theater.

Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

And here's the kicker...

A ! week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland
A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe.

Truth Of Taj Mahal

Subject: A truth of TAJ MAHAL.


As great making "TAJ MAHAL" has completed the glorious
350 yrs, I
would like to let you know some real facts.
Real History of "Taj Mahal"
"The Moghul Emperor Shah Jahan in the memory of his
wife Mumtaz Mahal
built
the Taj Mahal. It was built in 22 years (1631 to 1653)
by 20,000
artisans
brought to India from all over the world! . Many
people believe Ustad
Isa of
Iran designed it." This is what your guide probably
told you if you
ever
visited the Taj Mahal. This is the same story I read
in my history book
as a
student.

NOW READ THIS.......
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak,
who believes the
whole
world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True
Story, Oak says
the
Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient
Hindu temple palace
of
Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya). In the
course of his research
Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was
usurped by Shah Jahan
from
then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court
chronicle,
Badshahnama,
Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was
taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still
retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering
the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place !
for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.
For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in
such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the
term "Mahal" has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from
Afghanisthan to algeria. "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal
derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes.
Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name
to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims,
is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace. Oak also says
the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court
sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. Not a single
royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.
Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates
Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs
of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples
from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the
door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert
Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death),
describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to
the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to
Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy
building well before Shah Jahan's time.
Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies
that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather
than a mausoleum.Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since
Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they
contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for
worship rituals in Hindu temples. Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's
government tried to have Prof. Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and
threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences.
There is only one way to discredit or validat

Sri Aurobindo

Sri Aurobindo

Known as a revolutionary - ascetic, patriot, philosopher and yogi, Sri Aurobindo was a many faceted brilliant personality. Born in Calcutta on 15th August 1872, he tried to assimilate both Indian and Western philosophical thoughts and find the paths of divine communion and spiritual realization.


Early Influences

His father, Dr. Krishnadhan Ghose, was an Anglophile, and so sent little Aurobindo to England to study at St. Paul's school in London and then at King's College, Cambridge. In 1890, he passed the I.C.S examination with flying colours, but as he did not want to serve the British, he disqualified himself. Instead, he returned to India and served in Baroda as a civil servant, a professor, and finally as Vice-Principal of Baroda College.


Nationalistic Fervour

In 1905, Aurobindo Ghose joined the freedom struggle of India. He was the revolutionary who encouraged direct political action against the British instead of moderate reformism. He began writing essays, poetry, dramas and fiery articles on nationalism that stirred India's political consciousness. In this phase, he was appointed editor of the controversial "Bande Mataram" and was prosecuted in 1908 and jailed in Alipur for a year.


The Aurobindo Ashram

It was during this time that he had a divine spiritual experience in the form of a vision of the all-pervading reality. This changed his life, and in 1909, when he was acquitted, he did not return to politics, but retired to Pondicherry to pursue yoga in order to realise the mysteries of consciousness. He established an ashram there in 1910 and spent his time in seclusion, writing eminent books and poetry like ' Life Divine', 'Essays on Gita', 'Basis of Yoga', 'Love and death' and 'Savitri'.

The Aurobindo Ashram attracts hordes of people from all around the world to come to Pondicherry, study, meditate and discover themselves and the true meaning of existence. In India, Sri Aurobindo is admired not only for his nationalistic fervour but also as an ascetic and philosopher with a divine vision to guide us into a new awakening.

About This Blog

About This Blog

Back to TOP